Expand model tag support: add GLM-5.1, simplify Anthropic IDs, scan tags anywhere in message

- Flink update_bars debouncing
- update_bars subscription idempotency bugfix
- Price decimal correction bugfix of previous commit
- Add GLM-5.1 model tag alongside renamed GLM-5
- Use short Anthropic model IDs (sonnet/haiku/opus) instead of full version strings
- Allow @tags anywhere in message content, not just at start
- Return hasOtherContent flag instead of trimmed rest string
- Only trigger greeting stream when tag has no other content
- Update workspace knowledge base references to platform/workspace and platform/shapes
- Hierarchical knowledge base catalog
- 151 Trading Strategies knowledge base articles
- Shapes knowledge base article
- MutateShapes tool instead of workspace patch

gateway/knowledge/trading/strategies/real-estate/intra-asset-diversification.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+---
+description: "Diversify a real estate portfolio across property types, economic regions, and geographic areas to reduce non-systematic risk, using standard portfolio construction techniques to determine allocations."
+tags: [real-estate, diversification, portfolio-construction]
+---
+
+# Intra-Asset Diversification within Real Estate
+
+**Section**: 16.3 | **Asset Class**: Real Estate | **Type**: Diversification / Portfolio Construction
+
+## Overview
+While Section 16.2 addresses diversifying a multi-asset portfolio by adding real estate, this strategy addresses diversification within the real estate allocation itself. Real estate holdings can be diversified by geographic area, property type, property size, proximity to a metropolitan area, economic region, and other characteristics. Standard portfolio construction techniques determine the optimal allocation across these dimensions.
+
+## Construction / Mechanics
+Standard portfolio construction techniques (mean-variance optimization, VAR models — as described in Section 16.2) are applied within the real estate asset class to determine allocations across the dimensions below.
+
+## Return Profile
+By diversifying across property types and economic regions, non-systematic (idiosyncratic) risks specific to a single property type or local economy are reduced. Systematic (market-wide) real estate risk cannot be diversified away within the asset class. Returns come from the same two sources as any real estate investment: income (rental yield) and price appreciation, but are smoothed across multiple sub-segments.
+
+## Key Parameters / Signals
+- **Correlation matrix across property types and regions**: the primary input for MVO; diversification benefit is higher when correlations are lower
+- **Transaction costs**: diversification across many property types and regions increases transaction costs; empirical studies show benefits after taking these into account
+- **Number of segments**: with four property types × four U.S. regions = 16 groups (property-type-and-geographic diversification variant)
+
+## Variations
+
+### 16.3.1 Property Type Diversification
+Invest in real estate assets of different types: apartments, offices, industrial properties (manufacturing buildings and property), shopping centers, etc. Empirical studies suggest that property type diversification can be beneficial for non-systematic risk reduction even after accounting for transaction costs.
+
+### 16.3.2 Economic Diversification
+Diversify real estate investments by economic regions defined by characteristics such as the main economic activity, employment statistics, and average income. Regions with different economic drivers have lower return correlations. Empirical studies suggest this can reduce non-systematic risk and transaction costs relative to a naive geographic split.
+
+### 16.3.3 Property Type and Geographic Diversification
+Combine diversification by both property type and geographic region. For example, with four property types (office, retail, industrial, residential) and four U.S. regions (East, Midwest, South, West), there are 16 groups across which to diversify. This combined approach captures both property-type and regional diversification benefits simultaneously.
+
+## Notes
+- Intra-real-estate diversification still leaves the portfolio exposed to the systematic real estate cycle (house price bubbles, credit cycles, etc.)
+- Minimum lot sizes for direct real estate investment limit how finely diversification can be achieved; REITs reduce this constraint
+- Transaction costs in real estate are high; over-diversification into too many small positions can destroy returns through transaction costs alone
+- Economic region classification can be dynamic; regions that were economically distinct may converge over time, reducing diversification benefit
+- Property type correlations are not stable; they increase significantly during real estate downturns