In both encoding and contracts:
- Make sure that the tests names/encoder match what is happening (we had test_split_... that was only a single swap).
- Made modules inside the encodings tests
- In swap_encoders: there is one module per protocol
- In strategy_encoders: there is one module per strategy and an extra protocol_integration module. Inside the sequential module there is another module called chained_swaps
- In contracts, each strategy has its own file. Integration tests per strategy should also be here. Renamed TychoRouterIntegration to TychoRouterProtocolIntegration. Only protocol integration tests should be in this file
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4327 Took 1 hour 13 minutes
- In Tycho Router
- Fix integration tests
- If the trade is cyclical, we can't do the balance check for the correctness of the amountOut transfers
- In encoding,
- if it is a wrap trade, the transfer should be just a normal Transfer (not TransferFrom nor a Permit2Transfer)
- add test names to println! statements
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4315 Took 1 hour 0 minutes
Took 30 seconds
Took 21 seconds
Took 16 seconds
Took 17 seconds
Add transfer in Executor and pass receiver address in encoding
This is done by using the TAKE action instead of TAKE_ALL
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4315 Took 1 hour 36 minutes
Took 2 minutes
Add transfer in Executor and pass receiver address in encoding
Remove integration test with StETH pool because we don't support it at simulation level and there is something weird with the amounts (that it is not worth it to investigate now)
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4315 Took 34 minutes
Took 2 minutes
- This needed to be in BalancerV2 so that the executor can also take care of transfers from the user into the tycho router, to avoid having transfer actions mixed between the router and executors
- This needed to be in Curve so that the executor can also take care of transfers from the user into the tycho router, to avoid having transfer actions mixed between the router and executors
- For protocols like Balancer and Curve, which expect funds to be in the router at the time of swap, we must support also transferring funds from the user into the router. Doing this in the router would mean we are dealing with transfers in two different places: in the router main methods and in the executors. To avoid this, we are now performing transfers just in the executors, and two transfer types have been added to support transfers into the router.
TODO:
- Add this for Balancer and Curve (only added for USV4 atm).
- TODO consider renaming TRANSFER_FROM and TRANSFER_PERMIT2 to include "pool" in the name
- For now, hardcode them to TRANSFER on the rust encoder side. This will be fixed in an upcoming PR.
- Remove the split swap simple route integration test - seemed overkill since simple routes are tested in many other integration tests, the original rust test named doesn't exist anymore, and simple routes should anyway be passing through the single endpoint.
With this, we don't need the univ3 specific method in the router contract. This should be flexible enough for most protocols that integrate
TODO: is this safe enough??
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4411 Took 1 hour 52 minutes
Took 4 minutes
Took 5 minutes
This way we can define protocol and chain specific addresses in this file and use them in the Encoders
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4306 Took 1 hour 4 minutes
Curve pools use a different address from ETH (native token)
- Pass Chain into the SwapEncoderBuilder and SwapEncoder
- Add native_token_curve_address and native_token_address to CurveSwapEncoder
- Added integration test for this curve case
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4306 Took 1 hour 4 minutes
Took 11 seconds
We don't know the pool tokens in the ProtocolComponent, so we can't infer the indexes correctly. Added a call to the MetaRegistry curve contract to get the correct token indexes. To do this, I had to move the get_client to utils. We could actually refactor the transaction logic into its' own struct and use it here and in the approval logic
It was assumed that all the pools will have a "factory" static attribute, even if empty
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4306 Took 2 hours 28 minutes
Took 27 seconds
Also:
- Remove amount_out_min. Our reasoning is that we perform high-level final amount checks anyway (and expect users to do the same). Lower-level USV4 min amount checks are redundant.
