- In RestrictTransferFrom:
- Compare tokenIn with tokenIn from storage
- Correct docstrings
- Recompute storage slots with new names
- Rename transferFromNeeded to isTransferFromAllowed
- Don't track amount spent but subtract from amount allowed
- In TychoRouter: Rename transferFromNeeded to isTransferFromAllowed
Took 32 minutes
This will block an attempt to transfer from the user when we expect the funds to already be in the router.
chores:
- add docs
- in EncodingContext, rename transfer to transfer_type
Took 58 minutes
For organization (and thus safety) purposes.
Rename to RestrictTransferFrom.sol so that we can perform multiple transfer froms (upto an allowance) in the case of split swaps (where the split is the first swap).
TODO: Fix tests.
- Don't use payable(receiver).transfer(amount) and use OpenZeppelin's Address.sendValue instead
- In Univ4Executor send funds to the poolManager and not msg.sender
- In OneTransferFromOnly:
- rename method name
- don't pass the sender but hardcode it to caller() (msg.sender)
- Move marking the transfer as done up (before we actually transfer) to prevent reentrancy attacks
Took 18 minutes
This needs to be calculated before we perform a transferFrom in the router! This worked before since we were doing the transferFroms always from inside the executors.
Delete TokenTransfer.sol
Make slither happy
Bugfixes:
- Executors
- Ekubo:
- Fix the POOL_DATA_OFFSET value and remove sender from callback data
- Use SafeERC20
- Maverick and Univ2: Use safeTransfer and not safeTransferFrom
- Univ3: update expected data length
- Univ4: update the selectors (the signature changed)
- Router:
- For split swap we don't need to pass the tokenInReceiver, it should always be the router address
- For single and sequential: change order of the parameters (to be before the permit2 specific objects)
- Encoders:
- Update selector signatures
- For split swap pass the transfer_from (we might not need to if the token in is ETH)
Took 2 hours 51 minutes
The problem was that the pool manager was expecting an ABI encoded result to be returned and we were not returning that (we were returning just a result)
Special thanks to Max for figuring this out
Took 31 minutes
Do our own implementation. In the end this is much cleaner than I expected and I was able to do a few improvements:
- we don't need to use actions. using function selectors and delegate call instead
- we don't need to convert into V4 Router types
- we don't need to check balances to get the amount out, we can just use the returned value
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4437 Took 3 hours 56 minutes
Took 3 minutes
Took 11 minutes
- In Tycho Router
- Fix integration tests
- If the trade is cyclical, we can't do the balance check for the correctness of the amountOut transfers
- In encoding,
- if it is a wrap trade, the transfer should be just a normal Transfer (not TransferFrom nor a Permit2Transfer)
- add test names to println! statements
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4315 Took 1 hour 0 minutes
Took 30 seconds
Took 21 seconds
Took 16 seconds
Took 17 seconds
- The out transfer is now a responsibility of the Executors -> remove this from router methods
- Also adding a check that the receiver got the full amount out
- In encoding, if it is the last swap, pass the receiver as the trade receiver and not the router address (fix encoding tests)
- Fixed some solidity tests (after rebasing with a PR that is still open, I will fix them all)
TODO: Adapt curve and uniswap v4 to support this
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4315 Took 3 hours 7 minutes
Took 20 minutes
Took 59 seconds
Took 7 minutes
- For protocols like Balancer and Curve, which expect funds to be in the router at the time of swap, we must support also transferring funds from the user into the router. Doing this in the router would mean we are dealing with transfers in two different places: in the router main methods and in the executors. To avoid this, we are now performing transfers just in the executors, and two transfer types have been added to support transfers into the router.
TODO:
- Add this for Balancer and Curve (only added for USV4 atm).
- TODO consider renaming TRANSFER_FROM and TRANSFER_PERMIT2 to include "pool" in the name
- The old way was useful when we just had split swaps. Unfortunately, we now have split, sequential, and single swaps, which don't always require token indices or split percentages, so we need to decode differently for each case.
- Add some basic tests (will add more in next commits)
- Adapt sequential tests (which originally tested split swap)
- Adapt a forgotten single swap test
TODO:
- Fix encoding of single and sequential swaps to not expect the split sawp format every time (the split and the token indices are not necessary and consume unnecessary gas).
Rollback some of the Ekubo's Executor changes to a previous version to use the generic callback logic using transient storage
Took 1 hour 25 minutes
Took 13 seconds
With this, we don't need the univ3 specific method in the router contract. This should be flexible enough for most protocols that integrate
TODO: is this safe enough??
--- don't change below this line ---
ENG-4411 Took 1 hour 52 minutes
Took 4 minutes
Took 5 minutes
- add integration test
- cannot directly call _handleCallback from the locked method of the tycho router because of bytes memory to bytes callback conversion
- Rename to EkuboPoolKey because of conflict with USV4 pool key
- Bonus: fix bug where input token to swap method must be ERC20 (we should also support ETH)