refactor: deduplicate validation for Split & USV4 strategy
We use the same validation for both SplitSwapStrategy and UniswapV4Strategy - so, instead, put the validation into a Validator trait that gets initialized in both swap strategies in order to avoid duplication.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -81,24 +81,14 @@ pub struct SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
selector: String,
|
||||
native_address: Bytes,
|
||||
wrapped_address: Bytes,
|
||||
split_swap_validator: SplitSwapValidator,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
pub fn new(
|
||||
signer_pk: String,
|
||||
chain: Chain,
|
||||
swap_encoder_registry: SwapEncoderRegistry,
|
||||
) -> Result<Self, EncodingError> {
|
||||
let selector = "swap(uint256,address,address,uint256,bool,bool,uint256,address,((address,uint160,uint48,uint48),address,uint256),bytes,bytes)".to_string();
|
||||
Ok(Self {
|
||||
permit2: Permit2::new(signer_pk, chain.clone())?,
|
||||
selector,
|
||||
swap_encoder_registry,
|
||||
native_address: chain.native_token()?,
|
||||
wrapped_address: chain.wrapped_token()?,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// Validates whether a sequence of split swaps represents a valid solution.
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
|
||||
impl SplitSwapValidator {
|
||||
/// Raises an error if the split percentages are invalid.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Split percentages are considered valid if all the following conditions are met:
|
||||
@@ -193,20 +183,22 @@ impl SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
given_token: &Bytes,
|
||||
checked_token: &Bytes,
|
||||
native_action: &Option<NativeAction>,
|
||||
native_address: &Bytes,
|
||||
wrapped_address: &Bytes,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), EncodingError> {
|
||||
// Convert ETH to WETH only if there's a corresponding wrap/unwrap action
|
||||
let given_token = if *given_token == *self.native_address {
|
||||
let given_token = if *given_token == *native_address {
|
||||
match native_action {
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Wrap) => &self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Wrap) => wrapped_address,
|
||||
_ => given_token,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
given_token
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let checked_token = if *checked_token == *self.native_address {
|
||||
let checked_token = if *checked_token == *native_address {
|
||||
match native_action {
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Unwrap) => &self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Unwrap) => wrapped_address,
|
||||
_ => checked_token,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@@ -259,6 +251,24 @@ impl SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
pub fn new(
|
||||
signer_pk: String,
|
||||
chain: Chain,
|
||||
swap_encoder_registry: SwapEncoderRegistry,
|
||||
) -> Result<Self, EncodingError> {
|
||||
let selector = "swap(uint256,address,address,uint256,bool,bool,uint256,address,((address,uint160,uint48,uint48),address,uint256),bytes,bytes)".to_string();
|
||||
Ok(Self {
|
||||
permit2: Permit2::new(signer_pk, chain.clone())?,
|
||||
selector,
|
||||
swap_encoder_registry,
|
||||
native_address: chain.native_token()?,
|
||||
wrapped_address: chain.wrapped_token()?,
|
||||
split_swap_validator: SplitSwapValidator,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// To be used if there are two or more UniswapV4 swaps consecutively. They can be combined as a
|
||||
/// gas optimization.
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
@@ -268,6 +278,7 @@ pub struct UniswapV4StrategyEncoder {
|
||||
selector: String,
|
||||
native_address: Bytes,
|
||||
wrapped_address: Bytes,
|
||||
split_swap_validator: SplitSwapValidator,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl EVMStrategyEncoder for UniswapV4StrategyEncoder {}
|
||||
@@ -277,13 +288,17 @@ impl StrategyEncoder for UniswapV4StrategyEncoder {
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
solution: Solution,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Vec<u8>, Bytes, Option<String>), EncodingError> {
|
||||
self.validate_split_percentages(&solution.swaps)?;
|
||||
self.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&solution.swaps,
|
||||
&solution.given_token,
|
||||
&solution.checked_token,
|
||||
&solution.native_action,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
self.split_swap_validator
|
||||
.validate_split_percentages(&solution.swaps)?;
|
||||
self.split_swap_validator
|
||||
.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&solution.swaps,
|
||||
&solution.given_token,
|
||||
&solution.checked_token,
|
||||
&solution.native_action,
|
||||
&self.native_address,
|
||||
&self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let (permit, signature) = self.permit2.get_permit(
|
||||
&solution.router_address,
|
||||
&solution.sender,
|
||||
@@ -447,167 +462,9 @@ impl UniswapV4StrategyEncoder {
|
||||
swap_encoder_registry,
|
||||
native_address: chain.native_token()?,
|
||||
wrapped_address: chain.wrapped_token()?,
|
||||
split_swap_validator: SplitSwapValidator,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Raises an error if the split percentages are invalid.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Split percentages are considered valid if all the following conditions are met:
|
||||
/// * Each split amount is < 1 (100%)
|
||||
/// * There is exactly one 0% split for each token, and it's the last swap specified, signifying
|
||||
/// to the router to send the remainder of the token to the designated protocol
|
||||
/// * The sum of all non-remainder splits for each token is < 1 (100%)
|
||||
/// * There are no negative split amounts
|
||||
fn validate_split_percentages(&self, swaps: &[Swap]) -> Result<(), EncodingError> {
|
||||
let mut swaps_by_token: HashMap<Bytes, Vec<&Swap>> = HashMap::new();
|
||||
for swap in swaps {
|
||||
if swap.split >= 1.0 {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"Split percentage must be less than 1 (100%), got {}",
|
||||
swap.split
|
||||
)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
swaps_by_token
|
||||
.entry(swap.token_in.clone())
|
||||
.or_default()
|
||||
.push(swap);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (token, token_swaps) in swaps_by_token {
|
||||
// Single swaps don't need remainder handling
|
||||
if token_swaps.len() == 1 {
|
||||
if token_swaps[0].split != 0.0 {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"Single swap must have 0% split for token {:?}",
|
||||
token
|
||||
)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut found_zero_split = false;
|
||||
let mut total_percentage = 0.0;
|
||||
for (i, swap) in token_swaps.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
match (swap.split == 0.0, i == token_swaps.len() - 1) {
|
||||
(true, false) => {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"The 0% split for token {:?} must be the last swap",
|
||||
token
|
||||
)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
(true, true) => found_zero_split = true,
|
||||
(false, _) => {
|
||||
if swap.split < 0.0 {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"All splits must be >= 0% for token {:?}",
|
||||
token
|
||||
)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
total_percentage += swap.split;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !found_zero_split {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"Token {:?} must have exactly one 0% split for remainder handling",
|
||||
token
|
||||
)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Total must be <100% to leave room for remainder
|
||||
if total_percentage >= 1.0 {
|
||||
return Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(format!(
|
||||
"Total of non-remainder splits for token {:?} must be <100%, got {}%",
|
||||
token,
|
||||
total_percentage * 100.0
|
||||
)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Raises an error if swaps do not represent a valid path from the given token to the checked
|
||||
/// token.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A path is considered valid if all the following conditions are met:
|
||||
/// * The checked token is reachable from the given token through the swap path
|
||||
/// * There are no tokens which are unconnected from the main path
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the given token is the native token and the native action is WRAP, it will be converted
|
||||
/// to the wrapped token before validating the swap path. The same principle applies for the
|
||||
/// checked token and the UNWRAP action.
|
||||
fn validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
swaps: &[Swap],
|
||||
given_token: &Bytes,
|
||||
checked_token: &Bytes,
|
||||
native_action: &Option<NativeAction>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), EncodingError> {
|
||||
// Convert ETH to WETH only if there's a corresponding wrap/unwrap action
|
||||
let given_token = if *given_token == *self.native_address {
|
||||
match native_action {
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Wrap) => &self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
_ => given_token,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
given_token
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let checked_token = if *checked_token == *self.native_address {
|
||||
match native_action {
|
||||
Some(NativeAction::Unwrap) => &self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
_ => checked_token,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
checked_token
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Build directed graph of token flows
|
||||
let mut graph: HashMap<&Bytes, HashSet<&Bytes>> = HashMap::new();
|
||||
for swap in swaps {
|
||||
graph
|
||||
.entry(&swap.token_in)
|
||||
.or_default()
|
||||
.insert(&swap.token_out);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// BFS from validation_given
|
||||
let mut visited = HashSet::new();
|
||||
let mut queue = VecDeque::new();
|
||||
queue.push_back(given_token);
|
||||
|
||||
while let Some(token) = queue.pop_front() {
|
||||
if !visited.insert(token) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Early success check
|
||||
if token == checked_token && visited.len() == graph.len() + 1 {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(next_tokens) = graph.get(token) {
|
||||
for &next_token in next_tokens {
|
||||
if !visited.contains(next_token) {
|
||||
queue.push_back(next_token);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we get here, either checked_token wasn't reached or not all tokens were visited
|
||||
if !visited.contains(checked_token) {
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(
|
||||
"Checked token is not reachable through swap path".to_string(),
|
||||
))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(
|
||||
"Some tokens are not connected to the main path".to_string(),
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl EVMStrategyEncoder for SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {}
|
||||
@@ -617,13 +474,17 @@ impl StrategyEncoder for SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
solution: Solution,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Vec<u8>, Bytes, Option<String>), EncodingError> {
|
||||
self.validate_split_percentages(&solution.swaps)?;
|
||||
self.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&solution.swaps,
|
||||
&solution.given_token,
|
||||
&solution.checked_token,
|
||||
&solution.native_action,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
self.split_swap_validator
|
||||
.validate_split_percentages(&solution.swaps)?;
|
||||
self.split_swap_validator
|
||||
.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&solution.swaps,
|
||||
&solution.given_token,
|
||||
&solution.checked_token,
|
||||
&solution.native_action,
|
||||
&self.native_address,
|
||||
&self.wrapped_address,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let (permit, signature) = self.permit2.get_permit(
|
||||
&solution.router_address,
|
||||
&solution.sender,
|
||||
@@ -1204,16 +1065,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
println!("{}", _hex_calldata);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder() -> SplitSwapStrategyEncoder {
|
||||
let private_key =
|
||||
"0x123456789abcdef123456789abcdef123456789abcdef123456789abcdef1234".to_string();
|
||||
let swap_encoder_registry = get_swap_encoder_registry();
|
||||
SplitSwapStrategyEncoder::new(private_key, eth_chain(), swap_encoder_registry).unwrap()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_single_swap() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
let swaps = vec![Swap {
|
||||
@@ -1226,13 +1081,14 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
token_out: dai.clone(),
|
||||
split: 0f64,
|
||||
}];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&swaps, &weth, &dai, &None);
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_swap_path(&swaps, &weth, &dai, &None, ð, &weth);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_multiple_swaps() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -1258,13 +1114,14 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0f64,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None);
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_swap_path(&swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None, ð, &weth);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_disconnected() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -1293,7 +1150,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0.0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&disconnected_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None);
|
||||
let result =
|
||||
validator.validate_swap_path(&disconnected_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None, ð, &weth);
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
result,
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("not reachable through swap path")
|
||||
@@ -1302,7 +1160,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_unreachable_checked_token() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -1317,7 +1176,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
token_out: dai.clone(),
|
||||
split: 1.0,
|
||||
}];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&unreachable_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None);
|
||||
let result =
|
||||
validator.validate_swap_path(&unreachable_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None, ð, &weth);
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
result,
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("not reachable through swap path")
|
||||
@@ -1326,12 +1186,13 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_empty_swaps() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let empty_swaps: Vec<Swap> = vec![];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&empty_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None);
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_swap_path(&empty_swaps, &weth, &usdc, &None, ð, &weth);
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
result,
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("not reachable through swap path")
|
||||
@@ -1340,7 +1201,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_swap_single() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
let swaps = vec![Swap {
|
||||
@@ -1353,12 +1214,13 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
token_out: dai.clone(),
|
||||
split: 0f64,
|
||||
}];
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_split_percentages(&swaps);
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_split_percentages(&swaps);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_swaps_multiple() {
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1395,14 +1257,14 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0.0, // Remainder (20%)
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
assert!(encoder
|
||||
assert!(validator
|
||||
.validate_split_percentages(&valid_swaps)
|
||||
.is_ok());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_swaps_no_remainder_split() {
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1428,15 +1290,15 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0.3,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
encoder.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_total_swaps),
|
||||
validator.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_total_swaps),
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("must have exactly one 0% split")
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_swaps_zero_split_not_at_end() {
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1462,15 +1324,15 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0.5,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
encoder.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_zero_position_swaps),
|
||||
validator.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_zero_position_swaps),
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("must be the last swap")
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_swaps_splits_exceed_hundred_percent() {
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
let dai = Bytes::from_str("0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1506,17 +1368,15 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0.0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
encoder.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_overflow_swaps),
|
||||
validator.validate_split_percentages(&invalid_overflow_swaps),
|
||||
Err(EncodingError::InvalidInput(msg)) if msg.contains("must be <100%")
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_path_wrap_eth_given_token() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -1532,14 +1392,20 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0f64,
|
||||
}];
|
||||
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&swaps, ð, &usdc, &Some(NativeAction::Wrap));
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&swaps,
|
||||
ð,
|
||||
&usdc,
|
||||
&Some(NativeAction::Wrap),
|
||||
ð,
|
||||
&weth,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_validate_token_path_connectivity_wrap_eth_checked_token() {
|
||||
let encoder = get_mock_split_swap_strategy_encoder();
|
||||
|
||||
let validator = SplitSwapValidator;
|
||||
let eth = Bytes::from_str("0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000").unwrap();
|
||||
let usdc = Bytes::from_str("0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48").unwrap();
|
||||
let weth = Bytes::from_str("0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2").unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -1555,7 +1421,14 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
split: 0f64,
|
||||
}];
|
||||
|
||||
let result = encoder.validate_swap_path(&swaps, &usdc, ð, &Some(NativeAction::Unwrap));
|
||||
let result = validator.validate_swap_path(
|
||||
&swaps,
|
||||
&usdc,
|
||||
ð,
|
||||
&Some(NativeAction::Unwrap),
|
||||
ð,
|
||||
&weth,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user