Liquidity.Party/lmsr-amm
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor PartyPoolSwapMintImpl

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
tim
2025-09-25 21:46:59 -04:00
parent 6edad6e510
commit 9cac58013b
12 changed files with 481 additions and 291 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
test/PartyPlanner.t.sol
View File

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import "forge-std/Test.sol";
import "../src/LMSRStabilized.sol";
import "../src/PartyPlanner.sol";
import "../src/PartyPool.sol";
import {Deploy} from "../src/Deploy.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
// Mock ERC20 token for testing
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
function setUp() public {
// Deploy PartyPlanner
planner = new PartyPlanner();
planner = Deploy.newPartyPlanner();
// Deploy mock tokens
tokenA = new MockERC20("Token A", "TKNA", 18);
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
// Compute kappa then create pool via kappa overload
int128 computedKappa = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens.length, tradeFrac, targetSlippage);
(PartyPool pool, uint256 lpAmount) = planner.createPool(
(PartyPool pool, uint256 lpAmount) = planner.newPool(
name,
symbol,
tokens,
@@ -166,7 +167,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
deposits1[1] = INITIAL_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT;
int128 kappa1 = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens1.length, int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62));
(PartyPool pool1,) = planner.createPool(
(PartyPool pool1,) = planner.newPool(
"Pool 1", "LP1", tokens1, bases1,
kappa1, 3000, 5000, false,
payer, receiver, deposits1, 1000e18, 0
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
deposits2[1] = INITIAL_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT / 1e12; // Adjust for 6 decimals
int128 kappa2 = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens2.length, int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62));
(PartyPool pool2,) = planner.createPool(
(PartyPool pool2,) = planner.newPool(
"Pool 2", "LP2", tokens2, bases2,
kappa2, 3000, 5000, false,
payer, receiver, deposits2, 1000e18, 0
@@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
// Test token/deposit length mismatch
vm.expectRevert("Planner: tokens and deposits length mismatch");
// call old-signature convenience (it will still exist) for the mismatched-length revert check
planner.createPool(
planner.newPool(
"Test Pool", "TESTLP", tokens, bases,
int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62), 3000, 5000, false,
payer, receiver, deposits, 1000e18, 0
@@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
int128 kappaErr = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens.length, int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62));
vm.expectRevert("Planner: payer cannot be zero address");
planner.createPool(
planner.newPool(
"Test Pool", "TESTLP", tokens, bases,
kappaErr, 3000, 5000, false,
address(0), receiver, validDeposits, 1000e18, 0
@@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
// Test zero receiver address
vm.expectRevert("Planner: receiver cannot be zero address");
planner.createPool(
planner.newPool(
"Test Pool", "TESTLP", tokens, bases,
kappaErr, 3000, 5000, false,
payer, address(0), validDeposits, 1000e18, 0
@@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
int128 kappaDeadline = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens.length, int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62));
vm.warp(1000);
vm.expectRevert("Planner: deadline exceeded");
planner.createPool(
planner.newPool(
"Test Pool", "TESTLP", tokens, bases,
kappaDeadline, 3000, 5000, false,
payer, receiver, validDeposits, 1000e18, block.timestamp - 1
@@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ contract PartyPlannerTest is Test {
deposits[1] = INITIAL_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT;
int128 kappaLoop = LMSRStabilized.computeKappaFromSlippage(tokens.length, int128((1 << 64) - 1), int128(1 << 62));
(PartyPool pool,) = planner.createPool(
(PartyPool pool,) = planner.newPool(
string(abi.encodePacked("Pool ", vm.toString(i))),
string(abi.encodePacked("LP", vm.toString(i))),
tokens, bases,